IN RESPONSE: The Chilcotin War isn't over yet
Email
Print
Letter to Editor
Share
Updated: October 18, 2009 5:50 PM
Comment: I find this editorial article covering '(Signatory) Indian' issues and matters typically using key, negative words for maximum impact to sway readers' opinions against Signatory Indians and their issues.
As well, it is using words and titles such a 'Aboriginal Title,' which doesn't properly portray the true legal reality of Signatory Indians (the term 'Indian' that I am referring to here isn't the one reflected under Canadian Law); who through their 'Clan Mothers', the holders of their Territories, are the true owners of the lands in areas known as 'Canada' and the 'Uinted States of America', except those areas sold to the 'Crown'. As Common Law goes, it is British Law and 'Signatory Indians' are covered by their own Tribal Law under International Law.
The Crown Corporations stated above are, at this time, or putting it another way, presently holding their (the Signatory Indians) ownership tittles and Sovereignty in trust until the Signatory Indian's wake up and know who they are, and remove themselves as 'War Prisoners,' which is most of their present status.
As this is now coming to pass more and more, and as I see it, such subversive articles and all other subversion tactics will go down the toilet, so to speak (where they belong), with the minds/creators behind them.
Yours truly, and without prejudice or malice of any kind.
Albert Wilson, Heiltsuk
Richmond, B.C.
v2
