Letters

More consultation needed on ALR

The Editor,

Re: “ALR and farm changes are a great leap forward” (The Tri-City News, Aug. 13).

Tom Fletcher is confused about the Ministry of Agriculture’s consultation, which features a public survey. He mistakenly says it shows that changes in last spring’s ALR bill “have little or nothing to do with exclusions” of farmland from the Agricultural Land Reserve.

That bill, which made exclusions easier in 90% of the ALR (Zone 2) is now law. It’s no longer a current focus, in contrast to the survey about ALR regulations, which is open until August 22. The simple reason the survey doesn’t mention the bill or ALR exclusions is that they’re another matter.

It’s also illogical for Fletcher to imply that those who wanted consultation on the previous matter would oppose the current consultation. If anything, many want more of it.

To top off confusion with bad taste, Fletcher mocks MLA Lana Popham’s photo and bizarrely ties a survey question to Mao Zedong’s Great Leap Forward, which cost millions of lives.

Jim Wright

President of Garden City Conservation Society

 

Richmond

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Bolt clear of foot injury, ready for Comm Games
 
Pillar of the pantomime
 
University Is Free In Germany. Should Canada Copy and Paste?