Letters

LETTER: Mea culpa over forest fire sign

A letter-writer who criticized the above sign has now issued a mea culpa. - Will Johnson photo
A letter-writer who criticized the above sign has now issued a mea culpa.
— image credit: Will Johnson photo

Re: Why the new forest fire sign? and New forest fire sign built at little cost

Hey! I was wrong! And as I wipe some figurative egg off my face let me congratulate the people reported by Mr. Walton and Mr. Westerhaug in their letter correcting my criticism. And let my congratulations include my admiration for their ingenuity and initiative in crafting such a sign without a consultant.

But please, in addition to indicating the risk on the east side of the sign perhaps they could make both indications larger, as I believe the intended function of the sign is to advise citizens, particularly those driving by, of the wild fire risk level. And let me be bold enough to suggest that the size and location of the rating be large enough so that a driver can see it at a glance and not have to search for it.

Maurice A. Rhodes, Nelson

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Prince Rupert LNG plant, pipelines get B.C. certificates
 
Geothermal pitched as alternative to Site C dam
 
B.C. government pitches LNG spinoffs
Winter arrives in Mission
 
Hit and run victim identified
 
New recreation centre officially open in Agassiz
Bundling up
 
Pipeline protest in Burnaby being felt all the way to Chilliwack
 
School district to add staff