Letters

Surrey tree preservation gets ‘pathetic lip service’ from current council

My congratulations on a fine “Viewpoint” in the July 17 issue “Kudos for tree huggers,” by Frank Bucholtz.

As a director/treasurer of the Green Timbers Heritage Society (GTHS) and a 28-year volunteer for Surrey heritage, I have seen Surrey go from a rural to a paved community.

Thank you so much for a well-thought-out and clear criticism, pros and cons, of the pitiful lip service the current Surrey council has done for tree preservation.

The greatest weakness in its tree bylaw is that Surrey-owned land is exempt.

The long effort by GTHS to protect/promote the preservation of the “urban forest” is again in jeopardy as once again parcels are cut off for pavement and facilities.

We hope that your Viewpoint will be a catalyst to reawaken the Surrey public to these threats and loopholes, especially in the threats against already set-aside green space.

 

Jim Foulkes

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Ride-sharing company Uber spooks taxi firms
 
Hike to Port Moody utility bills in 2015
 
ELECTION 2014: Amalgamation, campaign spending & quitting early
Child ejected as Surrey collision shears car in half
 
Poverty forum slated for Friday in Surrey
 
SFU starts high-tech incubator
Langley wins pumpkin spice latte challenge
 
Certified General Accountants Association announces executive committee
 
Grocery giant Loblaw buys Shoppers Drug Mart