Letters

Surrey tree preservation gets ‘pathetic lip service’ from current council

My congratulations on a fine “Viewpoint” in the July 17 issue “Kudos for tree huggers,” by Frank Bucholtz.

As a director/treasurer of the Green Timbers Heritage Society (GTHS) and a 28-year volunteer for Surrey heritage, I have seen Surrey go from a rural to a paved community.

Thank you so much for a well-thought-out and clear criticism, pros and cons, of the pitiful lip service the current Surrey council has done for tree preservation.

The greatest weakness in its tree bylaw is that Surrey-owned land is exempt.

The long effort by GTHS to protect/promote the preservation of the “urban forest” is again in jeopardy as once again parcels are cut off for pavement and facilities.

We hope that your Viewpoint will be a catalyst to reawaken the Surrey public to these threats and loopholes, especially in the threats against already set-aside green space.

 

Jim Foulkes

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Smash-and-grab thieves target dance studio
 
South Surrey businesses victims of smash-and-grab robbers
 
Diseased trees a hazard for park users
Poll finds Lower Mainland voters ready to shake up city halls
 
Police seek Surrey taxi robbery suspect
 
Suspect arrested in death of 2 California deputies
High hopes commission will keep Queensborough connected to New West
 
Local charity joins fight against Ebola
 
New cenotaph will be ready, says City