Letters

Learning Improvement Fund isn’t the answer for education in B.C.

The Editor,

I keep hearing government representatives referring to the Learning Improvement Fund as if it is some kind of resolution to the class size and composition problem. They seem confused as to why teachers aren’t appreciative of this fund.

They don’t mention the fact that the Learning Improvement Fund (LIF) is not funding that is reliable, predictable or stable. Nor do they mention that the LIF has to be approached like a grant application.

Teachers and administrators use precious time to collect data and attend meetings to plead their cases in an attempt to get maybe half the funding that they need. And then, they’re supposed to feel lucky that they got any funding at all?

And they always have to remember that the LIF is NOT to replace staffing that has been cut — they have to be careful not to even allude to that fact while doing their best to show that their students have legitimate needs.

And the government is wondering why teachers aren’t happy with the Learning Improvement Fund?

Helen Boulanger, Coquitlam

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Election 2014: Five mayoral, 19 council candidates in Mission
 
Filming on location in Mission
 
Numerous issues discussed at all-candidates meeting
Mary Polak fends off NDP, Conservative challengers
 
Kim Richter seeks fifth term on Township council
 
McVeigh seeks a fifth term
BIA steps in to host White Rock candidates
 
Surrey, White Rock lose one candidate each
 
Election Notebook: Campaign offices open, Gu in China