Letters

LETTER: With vigilance, harm to ALC can be limited

Re: “Farmland fate a test for parties,” June 6 edition.

For Tom Fletcher, a fan of the recent ALR bill, only “a flood of exclusions of prime agricultural land” might make the concerns about it “at least partially true.” Short of the flood, it seems any bad effect from the weakened Agricultural Land Commission Act is nothing.

Fortunately, the bill spurred wide pro-ALR action. The efforts to stop “the bill to kill the ALR” (at least for consultation) were also a means to boost the critical mass of aware citizens for the next stage, which is now.

Awareness matters. We saw that in Richmond a few years ago when a fellow who publicly wanted a high-profile property out of the ALR almost got onto the Agricultural Land Commission panel to decide on it. Of course, the ALC is a tribunal, and like a court it is meant to start with evidence, not decisions.

Until the recent bill knee-capped the commission, current chair Richard Bullock was modernizing the ALC methods for quality assurance and efficiency, minimizing mistakes. Now the changes to the ALC Act have disabled much of the progress and worse. With vigilance, the harm can be limited.

Jim Wright
President, Garden City Conservation Society

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

10 Alternative Horror Movies for Halloween 2014
 
Federal-tax scam strikes Cowichan
 
Bank shears off in a flow of mud
RBCM book wins author B.C. prize
 
Pottery artist makes first showing at SFAS
 
Mozart to Mariah at Christmas concert
Bluegrass jams popular
 
Coffee House opener: Fraser Union
 
Carve out time for new pumpkin event at the Rollin Art Centre