Letters

A response

N. McGregor's letter regarding the review of Son of God by Taylor and Howe is so far off base as to be in left field.

Firstly, the letter writer does not seem to realize that a movie reviewer comments primarily on the quality of the movie making, not the quality or significance of the movie subject. Many films have been made about Christ and Christianity, some good and some not so good.

Son of God apparently fits into the latter category. Online professional movie critics generally seem to have given it less than average ratings. Just Google Son of God movie reviews and you will see what I mean.

Secondly, the letter writer thinks that, "the obvious negative bias towards Christianity should not be given a voice in our North Okanagan community newspaper." That is a very scary comment. In this country, I believe we have freedom of speech, freedom of religion and, if we choose, freedom from religion.

Even if a film or film reviewer did say something negative about Christianity, it could be and should be published.

Freedom of the press is another of the important freedoms we have. So let movie reviewers and The Morning Star do their jobs.

A. D. Drew

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Flu vaccine less effective against mutant strain
 
Amrik Virk advised Kwantlen on secret executive bonus
 
Saying goodbye to Turner
Christmas bash features Clinton Swanson trifecta
 
Donation supports literacy
 
Nelson Chamber’s CP station renovation receives more funding
Southeast district police honored as members of “Alexa’s Team”
 
Update: Fire on Fairview
 
Salvation Army kettle campaign rings in