Letters

What was the point of a report on a report?

It was with great regret I read in Friday’s paper that there had been perhaps a sacrifice of liberties in our municipality. I think that it was unfortunate Mr. Harrison was not allowed to speak, yet I think there was some merit behind it.

I read online his report of a report by a good reporter (UVic’s Dr. Smith) and I questioned what the point was of all the trouble. In the 10-page report in question, waxing over how poor the survey done by CTQ Consultants was, there was a brief three-sentence summary at the end saying, “be careful when making decisions.”

I do respect my fellow citizens’ concerns as to their beliefs about what North Saanich is. However, if they felt so strongly on the subject as to require a report on a report by a good reporter, maybe they should have spoken a little louder while the survey was going on (which I found particularly fair and just, but we’ll leave that for another day) last spring.

Ryan Trelford

North Saanich

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.