Opinion

Nothing minor about 3L’s application

Dear editor,

The Comox Valley Regional District has finally voted to not accept 3L’s application to apply for a ‘minor’ amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy.

So now the following question needs to be asked and considered, before another application is submitted.

Just how is it that an application that disregards the containment boundaries set out in the RGS would ever have been considered within the less stringent criteria of a ‘Minor’ Amendment, when it obviously would be a precedent-setting application worthy of Major Amendment status?

Grant Gordon

Area C

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Mount Polley dike completed, investigators move in
 
Soaring municipal pay criticized in provincial review
 
Cloverdale streetcar plan resurfaces
Ascending to the peak at The Summit Residences
 
Say thank you to a Surrey farmer
 
Voice of a young generation
White House intruder identified as Army veteran
 
Head-on crash near Greater Vancouver Zoo in Aldergrove
 
Million-dollar playground opens in Terra Nova