Opinion

Nothing minor about 3L’s application

Dear editor,

The Comox Valley Regional District has finally voted to not accept 3L’s application to apply for a ‘minor’ amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy.

So now the following question needs to be asked and considered, before another application is submitted.

Just how is it that an application that disregards the containment boundaries set out in the RGS would ever have been considered within the less stringent criteria of a ‘Minor’ Amendment, when it obviously would be a precedent-setting application worthy of Major Amendment status?

Grant Gordon

Area C

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Source: Lions come to terms with Tedford
 
More money pledged for Richmond Olympic Experience
 
Hawks anxious for the Christmas break
Second Langley farm hit by avian flu
 
Initial assessment finds mother unfit to stand trial: defence
 
Double wing downs Mission at Subway Bowl
Photo: Dribbling Dragon
 
Local pair at Soccer Canada camp
 
Eagles blanked in Vernon