Opinion

Nothing minor about 3L’s application

Dear editor,

The Comox Valley Regional District has finally voted to not accept 3L’s application to apply for a ‘minor’ amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy.

So now the following question needs to be asked and considered, before another application is submitted.

Just how is it that an application that disregards the containment boundaries set out in the RGS would ever have been considered within the less stringent criteria of a ‘Minor’ Amendment, when it obviously would be a precedent-setting application worthy of Major Amendment status?

Grant Gordon

Area C

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Prince Rupert LNG project delayed, others on track
 
First snow fall of the year
 
Fernie mom strings together Beads of Courage
Who says no free ride
 
Feisty kitty a survivor
 
Penticton neighbourhood up in signs
Herman goes to Africa
 
Isabella Dicken kids in Fernie get to grips with science
 
Gun amnesty declared in June