Put them to death
Email
Print
Letter to Editor
Share
Updated: June 24, 2009 3:17 PM
Re: “The end of faint hope,” June 9.
It’s about time this clause has been eliminated. It should never have been brought about.
However, Mr. Fast mentions that the current offenders, upon reaching their 15-year mark, have a three-month window to apply for parole, because he states the Supreme Court may not allow this early parole to be denied them.
I ask, who in the world is in charge of this country, the Supreme Court, or our federal government?
If the government passes a bill, my understanding is the Supreme Court must follow suit. To even give them the opportunity to apply for an early parole should be eliminated altogether, for they may seek to take their vengeance out on the witnesses who put them behind bars. What good is a law that puts the witnesses at potential danger?
The above procedure should never even be allowed to reach a stage where a heinous crime committer is kept in a prison cell after they are pronounced guilty.
This justice system of ours is showing more mercy on the heinous crime committer than they are showing the initial victims.
This heinous crime committer should be put to death shortly after being found guilty, via a heinous method inflicted upon them by the avenger of blood, the victims and family members and close friends of the whole victimized family, in a gruesome method to put fear into any other want-to-be criminals.
R.A. Mueller
v2
