Business

Maple Ridge among lowest for development fees

In a 2013 industrial development cost survey of 18 municipalities conducted by the National Association of Properties the District of Maple Ridge ranked second lowest for total amount of development fees collected last year.  - The News/Files
In a 2013 industrial development cost survey of 18 municipalities conducted by the National Association of Properties the District of Maple Ridge ranked second lowest for total amount of development fees collected last year.
— image credit: The News/Files

In a 2013 industrial development cost survey of 18 municipalities conducted by the National Association of Properties the District of Maple Ridge ranked second lowest for total amount of development fees collected last year.

Mayor Ernie Daykin says the result was not surprising given that the district has always been diligent about regularly reviewing and quantifying its fees.

That shows Maple Ridge is “a welcoming community for new business.

“Our charges have to be reflective of the cost of doing business and they are,” Daykin said.

The City of Pitt Meadows ranked 10th lowest, an improvement from the 2011 survey where the ranking was reported to be 12th.

Pitt Meadows Mayor Deb Walters says her council was pleased and also not surprised with the results.

“It’s about where we thought it would be,” she says.

Developer feedback Pitt Meadows council has heard over the years has usually been positive, Walters adds.

“We hear that quite often – we’re easy to do business with.”

The City of Burnaby had the lowest ranking in the survey with a total fee collection of $184,209, and the City of Richmond was the highest with a total fee collection of $1,030,418.

Maple Ridge collected $239,679  and Pitt Meadows collected $418,051.

Fees accounted for in the survey include subdivision, building and development permits, development cost charges, sewer and water connections and rezoning fees.

The association conducts an annual survey, alternating between an office or industrial scenario to determine municipal costs and development approval timelines.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Savour Cowichan: Genova proud to be the unofficial ambassador
 
Cherished First World War medals stolen during burglary
 
RCMP issue warning about suspicious male in Moorfield Road area
Black bear goes for the salmon at Stamp Falls
 
B.C. teachers endorse six-year deal, 86 per cent in favour (with VIDEO)
 
Gone but not forgotten
Looking Back: Jan 23
 
Alberni-Pacific Rim riding achieves Sensible BC petition total
 
Transit looks to revamp Alberni system